학술논문

The feasibility of using acoustic measures for predicting the Total Opacity Scores of chest computed tomography scans in patients with COVID-19.
Document Type
Article
Source
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. Mar2024, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p97-115. 19p.
Subject
*LUNG radiography
*CROSS-sectional method
*STATISTICAL correlation
*SOUND
*RECEIVER operating characteristic curves
*DATA analysis
*COMPUTED tomography
*PILOT projects
*SEX distribution
*VOICE disorders
*STATISTICAL sampling
*QUESTIONNAIRES
*KRUSKAL-Wallis Test
*REVERSE transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
*MANN Whitney U Test
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*LUNG diseases
*CASE-control method
*STATISTICS
*STATISTICAL reliability
*ARTIFICIAL neural networks
*RESEARCH
*SPEECH evaluation
*HUMAN voice
*PHONETICS
*DATA analysis software
*COVID-19
*REGRESSION analysis
*SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics)
*NONPARAMETRIC statistics
*DISEASE risk factors
RESEARCH evaluation
Language
ISSN
0269-9206
Abstract
To study the possibility of using acoustic parameters, i.e., Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) and Maximum Phonation Time (MPT) for predicting the degree of lung involvement in COVID-19 patients. This cross-sectional case–control study was conducted on the voice samples collected from 163 healthy individuals and 181 patients with COVID-19. Each participant produced a sustained vowel/a/, and a phonetically balanced Persian text containing 36 syllables. AVQI and MPT were measured using Praat scripts. Each patient underwent a non-enhanced chest computed tomographic scan and the Total Opacity score was rated to assess the degree of lung involvement. The results revealed significant differences between patients with COVID-19 and healthy individuals in terms of AVQI and MPT. A significant difference was also observed between male and female participants in AVQI and MPT. The results from the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve indicated that MPT (0.909) had higher diagnostic accuracy than AVQI (0.771). A significant relationship was observed between AVQI and TO scores. In the case of MPT, however, no such relationship was observed. The findings indicated that MPT was a better classifier in differentiating patients from healthy individuals, in comparison with AVQI. The results also showed that AVQI can be used as a predictor of the degree of patients' and recovered individuals' lung involvement. A formula is suggested for calculating the degree of lung involvement using AVQI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]