학술논문

Supporting the 'lived expertise' of older adults with type 1 diabetes: An applied focus group analysis to characterize barriers, facilitators, and strategies for self‐management in a growing and understudied population.
Document Type
Article
Source
Diabetic Medicine. Jan2024, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p1-17. 17p.
Subject
*HEALTH services accessibility
*FOCUS groups
*CAREGIVERS
*SELF-management (Psychology)
*TYPE 1 diabetes
*EXPERIENCE
*SURVEYS
*QUALITATIVE research
*INTERPERSONAL relations
*RESEARCH funding
*THEMATIC analysis
*TECHNOLOGY
Language
ISSN
0742-3071
Abstract
Introduction: There is a growing number of older adults (≥65 years) who live with type 1 diabetes. We qualitatively explored experiences and perspectives regarding type 1 diabetes self‐management and treatment decisions among older adults, focusing on adopting care advances such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Methods: Among a clinic‐based sample of older adults ≥65 years with type 1 diabetes, we conducted a series of literature and expert informed focus groups with structured discussion activities. Groups were transcribed followed by inductive coding, theme identification, and inference verification. Medical records and surveys added clinical information. Results: Twenty nine older adults (age 73.4 ± 4.5 years; 86% CGM users) and four caregivers (age 73.3 ± 2.9 years) participated. Participants were 58% female and 82% non‐Hispanic White. Analysis revealed themes related to attitudes, behaviours, and experiences, as well as interpersonal and contextual factors that shape self‐management and outcomes. These factors and their interactions drive variability in diabetes outcomes and optimal treatment strategies between individuals as well as within individuals over time (i.e. with ageing). Participants proposed strategies to address these factors: regular, holistic needs assessments to match people with effective self‐care approaches and adapt them over the lifespan; longitudinal support (e.g., education, tactical help, sharing and validating experiences); tailored education and skills training; and leveraging of caregivers, family, and peers as resources. Conclusions: Our study of what influences self‐management decisions and technology adoption among older adults with type 1 diabetes underscores the importance of ongoing assessments to address dynamic age‐specific needs, as well as individualized multi‐faceted support that integrates peers and caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]