부산대학교 도서관

Aim: This cross‐sectional survey aimed to determine the prevalence of Interventional Nephrology (IN) practice amongst nephrologists in the Asia‐Pacific Region (APR), specifically related to dialysis access (DA). Methods: The Association of VA and intervenTionAl Renal physicians (AVATAR) Foundation from India conducted a multinational online survey amongst nephrologists from the Asia‐Pacific to determine the practice of IN in the planning, creation, and management of dialysis access. The treatment modalities, manpower and equipment availability, monthly cost of treatment, specifics of dialysis access interventions, and challenges in the training and practice of IN by nephrologists were included in the survey. Results: Twenty‐one countries from the APR participated in the survey. Nephrologists from 18 (85.7%) countries reported performing at least one of the basic dialysis access‐related IN procedures, primarily the placement of non‐tunnelled central catheters (n‐TCC; 71.5%). Only 10 countries (47.6%) reported having an average of <4% of nephrologists performing any of the advanced IN access procedures, the most common being the placement of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter (20%). Lack of formal training (57.14%), time (42.8%), incentive (38%), institutional support (38%), medico‐legal protection (28.6%), and prohibitive cost (23.8%) were the main challenges to practice IN. The primary obstacles to implementing the IN training were a lack of funding and skilled personnel. Conclusion: The practice of dialysis access‐related IN in APR is inadequate, mostly due to a lack of training, backup support, and economic constraints, whereas training in access‐related IN is constrained by a lack of a skilled workforce and finances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]