학술논문
Long-term peridialytic blood pressure changes are related to mortality.
Document Type
Article
Author
Zuijdewijn, Camiel L M de Roij van; Rootjes, Paul A; Nubé, Menso J; Bots, Michiel L; Canaud, Bernard; Blankestijn, Peter J; Ittersum, Frans J van; Maduell, Francisco; Morena, Marion; Peters, Sanne A E; Davenport, Andrew; Vernooij, Robin W M; Grooteman, Muriel P C; investigators, the HDF Pooling Project
Source
Subject
*BLOOD pressure
*MORTALITY
*ABSOLUTE value
*
*
Language
ISSN
0931-0509
Abstract
Background In chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients, the relationship between long-term peridialytic blood pressure (BP) changes and mortality has not been investigated. Methods To evaluate whether long-term changes in peridialytic BP are related to mortality and whether treatment with HD or haemodiafiltration (HDF) differs in this respect, the combined individual participant data of three randomized controlled trials comparing HD with HDF were used. Time-varying Cox regression and joint models were applied. Results During a median follow-up of 2.94 years, 609 of 2011 patients died. As for pre-dialytic systolic BP (pre-SBP), a severe decline (≥21 mmHg) in the preceding 6 months was independently related to increased mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, P = .01] when compared with a moderate increase. Likewise, a severe decline in post-dialytic diastolic BP (DBP) was associated with increased mortality (adjusted HR 1.96, P < .0005). In contrast, joint models showed that every 5-mmHg increase in pre-SBP and post-DBP during total follow-up was related to reduced mortality (adjusted HR 0.97, P = .01 and 0.94, P = .03, respectively). No interaction was observed between BP changes and treatment modality. Conclusion Severe declines in pre-SBP and post-DBP in the preceding 6 months were independently related to mortality. Therefore peridialytic BP values should be interpreted in the context of their changes and not solely as an absolute value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]