부산대학교 도서관

Background: The accurate encoding of operation notes is essential for activity‐based funding and workforce planning. The aim of this project was to evaluate the procedural coding accuracy of vitrectomy and to develop machine learning, natural language processing (NLP) models that may assist with this task. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved vitrectomy operation notes between a 21‐month period at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Coding of procedures were based on the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS)—the Australian equivalent to the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes used in the United States. Manual encoding was conducted for all procedures and reviewed by two vitreoretinal consultants. XGBoost, random forest and logistic regression models were developed for classification experiments. A cost‐based analysis was subsequently conducted. Results: There were a total of 1724 procedures with individual codes performed within 617 vitrectomy operation notes totalling $1 528 086.60 after manual review. A total of 1147 (66.5%) codes were missed in the original coding that amounted to $736 539.20 (48.2%). Our XGBoost model had the highest classification accuracy (94.6%) in the multi‐label classification for the five most common procedures. The XGBoost model was the most successful model in identifying operation notes with two or more missing codes with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.80–0.92). Conclusions: Machine learning has been successful in the classification of vitrectomy operation note encoding. We recommend a combined human and machine learning approach to clinical coding as automation may facilitate more accurate reimbursement and enable surgeons to prioritise higher quality clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]