학술논문

Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture.
Document Type
Article
Source
BMC Palliative Care. 7/22/2023, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p1-11. 11p.
Subject
*PROFESSIONAL practice
*OCCUPATIONAL roles
*CRITICALLY ill
*RESEARCH methodology
*CLINICAL nurse leaders
*SOCIAL workers
*PATIENTS
*CULTURES (Biology)
*INTERVIEWING
*QUALITATIVE research
*HUMAN services programs
*SELF-efficacy
*PSYCHOLOGICAL safety
*PARADIGMS (Social sciences)
*COMMUNICATION
*CLINICAL competence
*QUALITY assurance
*INTERPROFESSIONAL relations
*RESEARCH funding
*NURSE practitioners
*PHYSICIANS
*GOAL (Psychology)
Language
ISSN
1472-684X
Abstract
Objective: Communication about patients' values, goals, and prognosis in serious illness (serious illness communication) is a cornerstone of person-centered care yet difficult to implement in practice. As part of Serious Illness Care Program implementation in five health systems, we studied the clinical culture-related factors that supported or impeded improvement in serious illness conversations. Methods: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of clinical leaders, implementation teams, and frontline champions. Results: We completed 30 interviews across palliative care, oncology, primary care, and hospital medicine. Participants identified four culture-related domains that influenced serious illness communication improvement: (1) clinical paradigms; (2) interprofessional empowerment; (3) perceived conversation impact; (4) practice norms. Changes in clinicians' beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors in these domains supported values and goals conversations, including: shifting paradigms about serious illness communication from 'end-of-life planning' to 'knowing and honoring what matters most to patients;' improvements in psychological safety that empowered advanced practice clinicians, nurses and social workers to take expanded roles; experiencing benefits of earlier values and goals conversations; shifting from avoidant norms to integration norms in which earlier serious illness discussions became part of routine processes. Culture-related inhibitors included: beliefs that conversations are about dying or withdrawing care; attitudes that serious illness communication is the physician's job; discomfort managing emotions; lack of reliable processes. Conclusions: Aspects of clinical culture, such as paradigms about serious illness communication and inter-professional empowerment, are linked to successful adoption of serious illness communication. Further research is warranted to identify effective strategies to enhance clinical culture and drive clinician practice change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]