학술논문
The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing.
Document Type
Article
Author
Sandhu, Sherine; Hickey, Martha; Lew, Raelia; Hammarberg, Karin; Braat, Sabine; Agresta, Franca; Parle, Anna; Allingham, Catherine; Ledger, William; Fisher, Jane; Johnson, Louise; Michelmore, Janet; Summers, Fiona; Hart, Roger; Norman, Robert J; Lieberman, Devora; Anderson, Richard A; Peate, Michelle
Source
Subject
*OVUM cryopreservation
*INTERNET access
*SATISFACTION
*CESAREAN section
*EGGS
*AUSTRALIANS
*FERTILITY preservation
*
*
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
1472-6947
Abstract
Background: Elective egg freezing decisions are complex. We developed a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing and conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate its acceptability and utility for decision-making. Methods: The online Decision Aid was developed according to International Patient Decision Aid Standards and evaluated using a pre/post survey design. Twenty-six Australian women aged 18–45 years, interested in receiving elective egg freezing information, proficient in English, and with access to the internet were recruited using social media and university newsletters. Main outcomes were: acceptability of the Decision Aid; feedback on the Decision Aid design and content; concern raised by the Decision Aid, and; utility of the Decision Aid as measured by scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale and on a study-specific scale assessing knowledge about egg freezing and age-related infertility. Results: Most participants found the Decision Aid acceptable (23/25), balanced (21/26), useful for explaining their options (23/26), and for reaching a decision (18/26). Almost all reported satisfaction with the Decision Aid (25/26) and the level of guidance it provided (25/26). No participant reported serious concerns about the Decision Aid, and most would recommend it to other women considering elective egg freezing (22/26). Median Decisional Conflict Scale score decreased from 65/100 (Interquartile range: 45–80) pre-Decision Aid to 7.5/100 (Interquartile range: 0–37.5) post-Decision Aid review (p < 0.001). Median knowledge score increased from 8.5/14 (Interquartile range: 7–11) pre-Decision Aid to 11/14 (Interquartile range: 10–12) post-Decision Aid review (p = 0.01). Conclusion: This elective egg freezing Decision Aid appears acceptable and useful for decision-making. It improved knowledge, reduced decisional conflict and did not raise serious concerns. The Decision Aid will be further evaluated using a prospective randomised control trial. Study registration: ACTRN12618001685202 (retrospectively registered: 12 October 2018). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]