학술논문

Patientology revisited: Toward tailored care pathways.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. Apr2023, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p472-484. 13p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subject
*CULTURE
*PATIENT participation
*MULTISYSTEM inflammatory syndrome
*PSYCHOLOGICAL vulnerability
*CHRONIC diseases
*SELF-management (Psychology)
*PATIENT-centered care
*SOCIAL capital
*INDIVIDUALIZED medicine
*MEDICAL protocols
*PRIMARY health care
*FAMILY-centered care
*HEALTH literacy
*HEALTH behavior
*COMMUNICATION
*INTEGRATED health care delivery
*COMORBIDITY
*HOSPITAL care of children
*PARENTS
*CHILDREN
Language
ISSN
1356-1294
Abstract
Background: Concepts such as patient‐centred care, patient empowerment and patient participation have challenged our understanding of what it means to be a patient and what role patients play in care pathways. Consequently, patientology as the medical sociological and anthropological study of patients is currently being reconceptualized through perspectives of health as individualized and privatized capital. Aims: This article explores the potential of such a patientological perspective to enhance our understanding of and tailor care pathways. Particularly, we aim to investigate how such a perspective can contribute to tailoring care pathways to the capacities of individual patients and their relatives. Materials & Methods: We elaborate on an emerging health capital‐theoretic model for patientology and study its potential for optimizing care pathways through two distinct cases of care contexts: communicative challenges in the context of integrative primary care for vulnerable chronically ill multi‐morbid patients and the potential of parent involvement in the acute hospitalization of children suspected to be affected by multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Results: Our results shed light on the importance of cultural and social capital of patients and their relatives in the design of effective tailored care pathways. We find that a lack of cultural and social capital presents a significant barrier to effective communication between patients and the healthcare professionals involved in their care pathways. We also find that understanding the cultural and social capital of relatives provides an entry point to their effective involvement in the care pathways of their children. Discussion & Conclusion: The implications of these findings extend beyond the concrete care contexts studied. This article contributes to our understanding of care pathways through a perspective of health inequalities being based on differences in health capital and demonstrates how the health capital‐theoretic patientology model facilitates the systematic development of guidelines for healthcare professionals to assess patients' resources and tailor their care pathways accordingly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]