학술논문

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab with ipilimumab for recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma after primary surgical intervention.
Document Type
Article
Source
International Journal of Clinical Oncology. Mar2023, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p409-415. 7p.
Subject
*NIVOLUMAB
*IPILIMUMAB
*MESOTHELIOMA
*PROGRESSION-free survival
*SURVIVAL rate
Language
ISSN
1341-9625
Abstract
Background: Treatment of recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains challenging. Our study examined the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of nivolumab with ipilimumab treatment for recurrent MPM after primary curative-intent surgery. Methods: Treatment comprised 360 mg nivolumab every 3 weeks and 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab every 6 weeks, both administered intravenously. Both were discontinued for progressive disease or serious adverse events (AEs). Additional post-treatment data were evaluated, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), post-treatment survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and AEs. Tumor response was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). Survival analysis was estimated using a Kaplan–Meier plot. Feasibility analysis was performed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 5.0. Results: Forty-one patients received nivolumab with ipilimumab for recurrent MPM after primary curative-intent surgery (median follow-up, 10.4 months; median treatment, 5.1 months). Overall, 18 patients exhibited partial response, 13 exhibited stable disease, and 10 had documented progressive disease. ORR and DCR were 43.9 and 75.6%, respectively. The 12-month post-treatment survival rate and PFS rate were 74.2 and 40.0%, respectively (median survival, not calculated; median PFS, 7.3 months). Further, 47 AEs were reported in 29 patients (70.7%), including grade 3–4 AEs in 14 patients (34.1%). Grade 4 hepatobiliary disorders were observed in 2 patients and grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 1. Conclusion: Nivolumab with ipilimumab treatment in patients with recurrent MPM after primary surgical treatment may be clinically efficacious, although serious AEs may be frequently observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]