학술논문

Challenges of design, implementation, acceptability, and potential for, biomedical technologies in the Peruvian Amazon.
Document Type
Article
Source
International Journal for Equity in Health. 12/19/2022, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-19. 19p.
Subject
*RESEARCH
*MEETINGS
*CULTURE
*HEALTH services accessibility
*RESEARCH methodology
*MEDICAL technology
*INTERVIEWING
*ECOLOGY
*HUMAN services programs
*EXPERIENCE
*PHENOMENOLOGY
*ENHANCEMENT medicine
*THEMATIC analysis
*OCCUPATIONAL adaptation
*HEALTH equity
*MEDICAL care of indigenous peoples
*TRANSPORTATION
Language
ISSN
1475-9276
Abstract
Background: Biomedical technologies have the potential to be advantageous in remote communities. However, information about barriers faced by users of technology in general and in remote Indigenous communities is scarce. The purpose of this study was to characterize the leading challenges faced by researchers who have used biomedical technologies in the Peruvian Amazon. Methods: This exploratory, qualitative study with a phenomenological approach depicts the lived experience of participants who were researchers with experience working with biomedical technologies in the Peruvian Amazon in the past five years. Analysis was based on three core themes: design, implementation, and acceptability. Sub-themes included environment, community, and culture. Of the 24 potential participants identified and contacted, 14 agreed to participate, and 13 met inclusion criteria and completed semi-structured interviews. Results were sent to each participant with the opportunity to provide feedback and partake in a 30-minute validation meeting. Five participants consented to a follow-up meeting to validate the results and provide further understanding. Results: Participants recognized significant challenges, including technologies designed out-of-context, difficulty transporting the technologies through the Amazon, the impact of the physical environment (e.g., humidity, flooding), and limited existing infrastructure, such as electricity and appropriately trained health personnel. Participants also identified cultural factors, including the need to address past experiences with technology and health interventions, understand and appropriately communicate community benefits, and understand the effect of demographics (e.g., age, education) on the acceptance and uptake of technology. Complementary challenges, such as corruption in authority and waste disposal, and recommendations for technological and health interventions such as co-design were also identified. Conclusions: This study proposes that technological and health interventions without efforts to respect local cultures and health priorities, or understand and anticipate contextual challenges, will not meet its goal of improving access to healthcare in remote Amazon communities. Furthermore, the implications of corruption on health services, and improper waste disposal on the environment may lead to more detrimental health inequities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]