부산대학교 도서관

Introduction: High‐power short‐duration (HPSD) has been proposed to shorten procedure times while maintaining efficacy and safety. We evaluated the differences in size and geometry between radiofrequency lesions obtained with this method and conventional ones. Methods and Results: Twenty‐eight sets of 10 perpendicular radiofrequency applications were performed with two commercially available catheters: a temperature‐controlled HPSD catheter (QDot‐Micro) and a conventional power‐controlled catheter (Thermocool SmartTouch) on porcine left ventricle. Different power settings (35, 40, 50, and 90 W), contact force (CF; 10 and 20 g), ablation index (AI; 400 and 550), and application times were combined to create conventional (35–40 W), HPSD (50 W) and very‐high‐power short‐duration (VHPSD; 90 W) lesions, that were cross‐sectioned and measured. About 4‐s VHPSD lesions were smaller, shallower, and thinner than HPSD performed with the QDot‐Micro catheter in any scenario of CF or AI (61 ± 7.8 mm3, 6.1 ± 0.3 mm wide, and 2.9 ± 0.1 mm deep with 10 g; 72.2 ± 0.5 mm3, 6.8 ± 0.3 mm wide, and 2.9 ± 0.2 mm deep with 20 g). Conventional and HPSD lesions performed with the temperature‐controlled catheter were generally bigger, deeper, and wider than the ones obtained with the power‐controlled catheter, as well as more consistent in size. This was especially true with the lower CF and AI scenario, while differences were less notable with other setting combinations. Conclusion: VHPSD lesions performed with QDot‐Micro catheter were smaller than any other lesions, which is especially attractive for posterior left atrial wall ablation. On the contrary, conventional‐powered and HPSD lesions performed with this catheter were equally sized (or even bigger with lower CF and AI objectives), as well as more consistent in size, which would guarantee transmurality in other locations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]