학술논문

Evaluation of the Processes and Outcomes of a Physician Leadership Program: The Continuous Feedback Loop Design.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. Fall2022, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p284-290. 7p.
Subject
*EDUCATION of physicians
*MINDFULNESS
*STATISTICAL power analysis
*EVALUATION of human services programs
*LEADERSHIP
*STAKEHOLDER analysis
*PROFESSIONAL employee training
*CURRICULUM
*HEALTH outcome assessment
*PRE-tests & post-tests
*HUMAN services programs
*COMMUNICATION
*QUESTIONNAIRES
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*PROFESSIONAL associations
*EDUCATIONAL outcomes
*ADULT education workshops
Language
ISSN
0894-1912
Abstract
Introduction: Physicians assume leadership roles in their health care organizations and practices often without support or training. The Physicians Leadership Academy provides integrated leadership seminars, mindfulness training, and executive coaching in a 10-month curriculum to physicians across area organizations. Methods: Program evaluators responded to stakeholders' need for continuous program improvement by developing a continuous feedback loop evaluation design incorporating a program monitoring system and a theory-driven program evaluation. Given the size of the 2019 to 20 cohort (n = 19), a one-group pretest/posttest design was used to assess the mechanisms of the program (mindfulness and wellbeing) along with knowledge development, emotional intelligence, and personal and professional growth. The assessments used a combination of published and administrator-developed assessments to address the unique aspects of the program. Doing such ensured continuous improvement and sustainability for the program. Results: The cohort of physicians demonstrated significant engagement and learning across the curriculum, improved mindfulness, and improved capacity of the providers to affect their health care system and communities. Conclusions: The utility of the program was demonstrated through quantitative and qualitative analyses. Implications of the methodology for future evaluations of program developments are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]