부산대학교 도서관

Purpose: Vision and ergonomics are crucial variables for successful outcomes during neurosurgery procedures. Two-dimension video telescope operating monitor (VITOM) exoscope has emerged as an alternative, which is cheaper than microscope. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of 2D VITOM and to compare its merits and demerits with respect to microscope. Methods: VITOM 2D (Karl Storz, Germany) was used in 9 cranial and 5 spinal pediatric cases. While KINEVO operative microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) was used in 12 cranial and 6 spinal pediatric patients. All surgeries were performed by single senior neurosurgeon. The author's experience and opinions, as well as qualitative data, were analyzed. A comparison was made on image quality, illumination, field of view, and magnification of the operative field and ergonomics. Results: Seven out of 9 cranial pediatric cases were switched from VITOM 2D to operative microscope due to low-image definition in depth of cranial cavity. Poor visualization of bleeding source in surgical field was another major drawback. Two cranial cases in which exoscope were used exclusively, included superficial tumors. In all 5 spinal cases, VITOM 2D was successfully used without any major difficulty. The exoscope's advantages were observed in ergonomics and ease in switching to naked eyes, but the microscope's field of view, illumination, magnification, and user-friendliness was considered superior. Conclusion: 2D-VITOM is best suited for spinal and superficial cranial tumors. However, a lot of modifications are to be done especially in optics to become a substitute for operative microscope. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]