학술논문

A Draconian Law: Examining the Navigation of Coalition Politics and Policy Reform by Health Provider Associations in Karnataka, India.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law. Aug2021, Vol. 46 Issue 4, p703-730. 28p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts.
Subject
*HEALTH policy
*INSTITUTIONAL cooperation
*SCIENTIFIC observation
*RESEARCH methodology
*HOSPITAL laws
*INTERVIEWING
*MEDICAL care
*HOSPITAL costs
*HEALTH care reform
*QUALITATIVE research
*UNOBTRUSIVE measures
*RESEARCH funding
*COALITIONS
*PROPRIETARY hospitals
*POLICY sciences
*CONTENT analysis
*MEDICAL societies
Language
ISSN
0361-6878
Abstract
A comprehensive picture of provider coalitions in health policy making remains incomplete because of the lack of empirically driven insights from low- and middle-income countries. The authors examined the politics of provider coalitions in the health sector in Karnataka, India, by investigating policy processes between 2016 and 2018 for developing amendments to the Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act. Through this case, they explore how provider associations function, coalesce, and compete and the implications of their actions on policy outcomes. They conducted in-depth interviews, document analysis, and nonparticipant observations of two conferences organized by associations. They found that provider associations played a major role in drafting the amendments and negotiating competing interests within and between doctors and hospital associations. Despite the fragmentation, the associations came together to reinterpret the intentions of the amendments as being against the interests of the profession, culminating in a statewide protest and strike. Despite this show of strength, provider associations only secured modest modifications. This case demonstrates the complex and unpredictable influence of provider associations in health policy processes in India. The authors' analysis highlights the importance of further empirical study on the influence of professional and trade associations across a range of health policy cases in low- and middle-income countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]