부산대학교 도서관

Background: Most of the evidence for enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) in colorectal surgery relies on nonrandomized studies with control groups either historical or operated on at different facilities. The aim of this study was to investigate ERP in coeval groups admitted in different wards at the same hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort of consecutive patients (n = 100) undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection completing a standardized ERP (ERP group) was compared with patients (n = 100) operated with traditional perioperative care in the same period at the same institution (non-ERP group). The two groups were located in separate wards and shared the same anesthesiologists. The exclusion criteria were: >80 years old, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) IV, metastatic disease, and inflammatory bowel disease. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LoS), used as a proxy of functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included: postoperative complications, readmission rate, mortality, and protocol adherence. Results: The ERP group protocol adherence was 81%. The LoS was significantly reduced in the ERP group (4 versus 7 days). The number of 30-day postoperative complications was lower in the ERP group (P < .001). No increase was found in 30-day readmission or mortality. Conventional perioperative protocol was the only predictor of any postoperative complication and, together with male sex and age 65-74 years old, was the only factor associated with prolonged LoS. Conclusion: Implementing a colorectal ERP is feasible, safe, and efficient for functional recovery, but high protocol adherence is needed. Following traditional perioperative care is associated with more postoperative complications and prolonged LoS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]