부산대학교 도서관

Background This study tested a theory-based adherence-enhancing intervention: the "Interprofessional Medication Adherence Program" (IMAP) to increase human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) retention in care. Methods We retrospectively compared our intervention center (intervention group [IG]) with a standard of care center (control group [CG]) both participating in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study between 2004 and 2012. Endpoints were defined as >6-month and >12-month gaps in care for intervals of care longer than 6 and 12 months without any blood draw. Inverse probability of treatment weights was used to adjust for differences between patients at the 2 centers. Viral failure was defined as ribonucleic acid ≥50 copies/mL after 24+ weeks on antiretrovirals. Results The IG included 451 patients, CG 311. In the IG, 179 (40%) patients took part in the IMAP for a median of 27 months (interquartile range, 12–45). Gaps in care of ≥6 months were significantly more likely to happen in the CG versus IG (74.6% vs 57%, P <.001). The median time until the first treatment gap was longer in the IG vs CG (120 vs 84 weeks, P <.001). Gaps in care of ≥12 months evaluated in 709 (93%) patients were significantly more likely to occur in the CG compared with the IG (22.6% vs 12.5%, P <.001). The rate of viral failure was significantly lower in the IG (8.3% vs 15.1%, P =.003). Conclusions This study, in a real-world setting, shows the effectiveness of the IMAP to reduce 6- and 12-month gaps in follow up among people with HIV. These results should be confirmed by studies in other settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]