학술논문

School policies, built environment and practices for non-communicable disease (NCD) prevention and control in schools of Delhi, India.
Document Type
Article
Source
PLoS ONE. 4/18/2019, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p1-11. 11p.
Subject
*CANDIDATUS diseases
*SCHOOL rules & regulations
*NON-communicable diseases
*SCHOOL environment
*PRIVATE schools
*SCHOOLS
Language
ISSN
1932-6203
Abstract
Objective: To assess school policies, built environment and practices for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in schools of Delhi, India. Methods: School built environments and policies were assessed using a structured observation checklist in 10 private and 9 government schools which were randomly selected from all 184 co-educational schools with primary to senior secondary level education in Delhi, India. A self-administered questionnaire was also completed by teachers from each school (n = 19) to capture information specific to school policies. Surveys were also conducted with parent of students in class II (aged 6–7 years; n = 574) and student in class XI (aged 15–16 years, n = 755) to understand school practices. Results: The majority of government (88.9%; n = 8) and private (80%; n = 8) schools reported having comprehensive school health policy. In terms of specific health behaviours, policies related to diet and nutrition in government schools were mostly restricted to primary levels with provision of the mid-day meal programme. All schools had two physical education periods per week of about 45–50 minutes. Most schools were compliant with tobacco-free school guidelines (n = 15 out of 19) and had alcohol control policies (n = 13 out of 19). Parent and student reports of practices indicated that school policies were not consistently implemented. Conclusion: Most schools in Delhi have policies that address health behaviours in students, but there was considerable variation in the types and number of policies and school environments. Government schools are more likely to have policies in place than private schools. Further work is needed to evaluate how these policies are implemented and to assess their impact on health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]