학술논문

Self-reported adherence to physical activity recommendations compared to the IPAQ interview in patients with hypertension.
Document Type
Article
Source
Patient Preference & Adherence. Jan2019, Vol. 13, p209-214. 6p.
Subject
*BLOOD pressure
*MEDICAL history taking
*LEISURE
*CROSS-sectional method
*PHYSICAL activity
*SELF-evaluation
Language
ISSN
1177-889X
Abstract
Background: Physical activity (PA) is recommended as adjuvant therapy to control blood pressure (BP). The effectiveness of simple recommendations is not clear. We aimed to assess the agreement between self-report of adherence to PA in clinical routine and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) interview and its association with BP control. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with hypertensive outpatients. Adherence to recommendation to PA was assessed by the physician and IPAQ interview. A cutoff of 150 minutes/week was used to classify active or nonactive patients. High sitting time was considered >4 hours/day. A total of 127 individuals (SBP 144.9±24.4 mmHg/DBP 82.0±12.8 mmHg) were included. Results: A total of 69 subjects (54.3%) reported to be active to their physician, whereas 81 (63.8%) were classified as active by IPAQ (6.3% active in leisure time PA). Kappa test was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.06–0.37). The rate of BP control was 45.7%. There was no association with the reported PA assessed by both methods nor with sitting time. Our results demonstrated poor agreement between self-report adherence and IPAQ interview, and neither evaluation was associated with BP control. Conclusion: Our findings underpin evidences that a simple PA recommendation has low association with BP control in clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]