학술논문

Monetized health benefits attributable to mobile source emission reductions across the United States in 2025.
Document Type
Article
Source
Science of the Total Environment. Feb2019:Part 2, Vol. 650, p2490-2498. 9p.
Subject
Language
ISSN
0048-9697
Abstract
Abstract By-products of mobile source combustion processes, such as those associated with gasoline- and diesel-powered engines, include direct emissions of particulate matter as well as precursors to particulate matter and ground-level ozone. Human exposure to fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm (PM 2.5) is associated with increased incidence of premature mortality and morbidity outcomes. This study builds upon recent, detailed source-apportionment air quality modeling to project the health-related benefits of reducing PM 2.5 from mobile sources across the contiguous U.S. in 2025. Updating a previously published benefits analysis approach, we develop national-level benefit per ton estimates for directly emitted PM 2.5 , SO 2 /pSO 4 , and NO X for 16 mobile source sectors spanning onroad vehicles, nonroad engines and equipment, trains, marine vessels, and aircraft. These benefit per ton estimates provide a reduced-form tool for estimating and comparing benefits across multiple mobile source emission scenarios and can be applied to assess the benefits of mobile source policies designed to improve air quality. We found the benefit per ton of directly emitted PM 2.5 in 2025 ranges from $110,000 for nonroad agriculture sources to $700,000 for onroad light duty gas cars and motorcycles (in 2015 dollars and based on an estimate of PM-related mortality derived from the American Cancer Society cohort study). Benefit per ton values for SO 2 /pSO 4 range from $52,000 for aircraft sources (including emissions from ground support vehicles) to $300,000 for onroad light duty diesel emissions. Benefit per ton values for NO X range from $2100 for C1 and C2 marine vessels to $7500 for "nonroad all other" mobile sources, including industrial, logging, and oil field sources. Benefit per ton estimates increase approximately 2.26-fold when using an alternative concentration response function to derive PM 2.5 -related mortality. We also report benefit per ton values for the eastern and western U.S. to account for broad spatial heterogeneity patterns in emissions reductions, population exposure and air quality benefits. Graphical abstract Unlabelled Image Highlights • Mobile sources emit pollutants associated with adverse health outcomes. • PM 2.5 -related benefit per ton (BPT) values estimated for 16 mobile source sectors • BPT estimates provide a reduced-form tool for monetizing health impacts. • Can be used to assess health benefits of alternative air quality control scenarios • Regional (East/West) mobile source BPT values also presented for each sector [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]