학술논문

Development and Early Experience of the First Joint Military Health System-Veterans Affairs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Program.
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
Military Medicine. Nov2017, Vol. 182 Issue 11, pe2036-e2040. 5p. 1 Color Photograph, 3 Charts.
Subject
*AORTIC stenosis treatment
*HEALTH of military personnel
*VETERANS' health
*MEDICAL care
*AORTIC stenosis
*HEALTH care teams
*PROSTHETIC heart valves
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*HUMAN services programs
*HOSPITAL mortality
*ECONOMICS
AORTIC valve surgery
Language
ISSN
0026-4075
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedure that has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis. This is the most common valvular heart condition in developed countries, affecting 3.4% of those ages 75 and above. Because there is no medical therapy that can arrest progression of the disease, valve replacement forms the cornerstone of therapy.Methods: Naval Medical Center San Diego and the VA San Diego Healthcare System have developed a unique collaborative TAVR program-a first in the Department of Defense-to offer this revolutionary procedure to their beneficiaries. Herein, we review development of the program and outcome for patients referred during the first 9 months.Findings: Development of the program was a multiyear process made successful because of administrative support, facility upgrades, and collaboration within the crossfacility and multispecialty heart valve team. In the first 9 months, 29 patients were referred for evaluation. Twenty-two (average age 80 years) underwent TAVR, whereas others were deemed nonoperable or were pending disposition at the time of this report. Patients who underwent TAVR had a predicted risk of procedural mortality from surgical aortic valve replacement of 7.7%, similar to other trials and registry studies. After mean follow-up of 5.6 months (range 30-355 days), zero deaths were recorded in the patients who underwent TAVR. Compared to other nonfederal local institutions, the program also realized a cost savings of approximately 17%, or nearly $10,000, per patient.Discussion: In the first 9 months, results were positive and consistent with expectations from national and international registries. Our hope is that this program may serve as an example for other federal facilities looking to start their own combined programs to improve health care quality and patient experience while simultaneously achieving considerable cost containment within a constrained national health care budget. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]