학술논문

Acute Responses of Strength and Running Mechanics to Increasing and Decreasing Pain in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Athletic Training (Allen Press); May2017, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p411-421, 11p, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram, 5 Charts
Subject
Data analysis
Physiological adaptation
Analysis of variance
Crossover trials
Dynamics
Ground reaction forces (Biomechanics)
Range of motion of joints
Kinematics
Muscle strength
Probability theory
Running
Statistics
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Effect sizes (Statistics)
Pain measurement
Visual analog scale
Repeated measures design
Plica syndrome
Severity of illness index
Motion capture (Human mechanics)
Data analysis software
Descriptive statistics
Mann Whitney U Test
Language
ISSN
10626050
Abstract
Context: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is typically exacerbated by repetitive activities that load the patellofemoral joint, such as running. Understanding the mediating effects of changes in pain in individuals with PFP might inform injury progression, rehabilitation, or both. Objective: To investigate the effects of changing pain on muscular strength and running biomechanics in those with PFP. Design: Crossover study. Setting: University research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Seventeen participants (10 men, 7 women) with PFP. Intervention(s): Each participant completed knee painreducing and pain-inducing protocols in random order. The pain-reducing protocol consisted of 15 minutes of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) around the patella. The pain-inducing protocol was sets of 20 repeated single-legged squats (RSLS). Participants completed RSLS sets until either their pain was within at least 1 cm of their pain during an exhaustive run or they reached 10 sets. Main Outcome Measure(s): Pain, isometric hip and trunk strength, and running mechanics were assessed before and after the protocols. Dependent variables were pain, normalized strength (abduction, extension, external rotation, lateral trunk flexion), and peak lower extremity kinematics and kinetics in all planes. Pain scores were analyzed using a Friedman test. Strength and mechanical variables were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance. The a level was set at P , .05. Results: Pain was decreased after the TENS (pretest: 3.10 ± 1.95, posttest: 1.89 ± 2.33) and increased after the RSLS (baseline: 3.10 ± 1.95, posttest: 4.38 ± 2.40) protocols (each P < .05). The RSLS protocol resulted in a decrease in hipextension strength (baseline: 0.355 ± 0.08 kg/kg, posttest: 0.309 ± 0.09 kg/kg; P < .001). Peak plantar-flexion angle was decreased after RSLS (baseline: -13.97° ± 6.41°, posttest: -12.84° ± 6.45° P = .003). Peak hip-extension (pretest: -2.31 ± 0.46) and hip-abduction (pretest: -2.02 ± 0.35) moments decreased after both the TENS (extension: -2.15 ± 0.48 Nm/ kg, P = .015; abduction: -1.91 ± 0.33 Nm/kg, P = .015) and RSLS (extension: -2.18 ± 0.52 Nm/kg, P = .003; abduction: -1.87 ± 0.36 Nm/kg, P = .039) protocols. Conclusions: This study presents a novel and effective method of increasing pain in persons with PFP. Functionally increased pain after RSLS coincides with reduced hipextensor muscle strength and decreased plantar-flexion angle during running. The TENS treatment decreased pain during running in those with PFP but failed to influence strength. Hip moments were reduced by both protocols, which may demonstrate that acute increases or decreases in pain cause runners to change their mechanics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]