학술논문

Statewide program to promote institutional delivery in Gujarat, India: who participates and the degree of financial subsidy provided by the Chiranjeevi Yojana program.
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
Journal of Health, Population & Nutrition. 1/27/2016, Vol. 35, p1-10. 10p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subject
*HEALTH programs
*PUBLIC-private sector cooperation
*HEALTH policy
*SUBSIDIES
*HEALTH facilities
*CHILDBIRTH at home
*ASIANS
*CESAREAN section
*COMPARATIVE studies
*DELIVERY (Obstetrics)
*HEALTH services accessibility
*LONGITUDINAL method
*RESEARCH methodology
*MEDICAL care costs
*MEDICAL cooperation
*POVERTY
*PUBLIC welfare
*RESEARCH
*SURVEYS
*GOVERNMENT programs
*EVALUATION research
*AT-risk people
*CROSS-sectional method
*PATIENTS' attitudes
*STATE health plans
*ECONOMICS
Language
ISSN
1606-0997
Abstract
Background: The Chiranjeevi Yojana (CY) is a large public-private partnership program in Gujarat, India, under which the state pays private sector obstetricians to provide childbirth services to poor and tribal women. The CY was initiated statewide in 2007 because of the limited ability of the public health sector to provide emergency obstetric care and high out-of-pocket expenditures in the private sector (where most qualified obstetricians work), creating financial access barriers for poor women. Despite a million beneficiaries, there have been few reports studying CY, particularly the proportion of vulnerable women being covered, the expenditures they incur in connection with childbirth, and the level of subsidy provided to beneficiaries by the program.Methods: Cross-sectional facility based the survey of participants in three districts of Gujarat in 2012-2013. Women were interviewed to elicit sociodemographic characteristics, out-of-pocket expenditures, and CY program details. Descriptive statistics, chi square, and a multivariable logistic regression were performed.Results: Of the 901 women surveyed in 129 facilities, 150 (16 %) were CY beneficiaries; 336 and 415 delivered in government and private facilities, respectively. Only 36 (24 %) of the 150 CY beneficiaries received a completely cashless delivery. Median out-of-pocket for vaginal/cesarean delivery among CY beneficiaries was $7/$71. The median degree of subsidy for women in CY who delivered vaginally/cesarean was 85/71 % compared to out-of-pocket expenditure of $44/$208 for vaginal/cesarean delivery paid by non-program beneficiaries in the private health sector.Conclusions: CY beneficiaries experienced a substantially subsidized childbirth compared to women who delivered in non-accredited private facilities. However, despite the government's efforts at increasing access to delivery services for poor women in the private sector, uptake was low and very few women experienced a cashless delivery. While the long-term focus remains on strengthening the public sector's ability to provide emergency obstetric care, the CY program is a potential means by which the state can ensure its poor mothers have access to necessary care if uptake is increased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]