학술논문

Symptom Provocation During Aerobic and Dynamic Supervised Exercise Challenges in Adolescents With Sport-Related Concussion.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Athletic Training (Allen Press); Feb2021, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p148-156, 9p, 3 Diagrams, 3 Charts
Subject
Athletes
Retrospective studies
Data analysis
Sports participation
Kruskal-Wallis Test
Statistics
Aerobic exercises
Dizziness
Sports injuries
Fisher exact test
Mann Whitney U Test
Race
Brain concussion
Descriptive statistics
Chi-squared test
Data analysis software
Headache
Ethnic groups
Symptoms
Language
ISSN
10626050
Abstract
Supervised exercise challenges (SECs) have been shown to be safe and beneficial in the early symptomatic period after concussion. Thus far, most in-clinic SECs studied have included a form of basic aerobic exercise only. An SEC that also includes dynamic forms of exercise mimics all steps of a standard return-to-play progression and may enhance the detection of concussion symptoms to guide in-clinic management decisions. To determine whether an SEC that includes a dynamic SEC (DSEC) uncovered symptoms that would not have been identified by an SEC involving an aerobic SEC (ASEC) alone in adolescent patients with sport-related concussion. Retrospective case series. Multidisciplinary sport concussion clinic at a tertiary care center. A total of 65 adolescent athletes (mean age = 14.9 ± 2.0 years, 72.3% males) who underwent an in-clinic SEC within 30 days of concussion. Presence of pre-exercise symptoms and symptom provocation during the SEC were recorded, with exercise-provoked symptoms categorized as occurring during ASEC or DSEC. Of the total patient sample, 69.2% (n = 45/65) experienced symptom provocation at some point during the SEC. Symptoms were provoked in 20 patients during the ASEC, whereas 25 completed the ASEC without symptom provocation before becoming symptomatic during the subsequent DSEC and 20 completed the SEC without any symptom provocation. Of the 65 patients in the total sample, 46 were asymptomatic immediately before the SEC. Of these previously asymptomatic patients, 23.9% (n = 11/46) experienced symptom provocation during the ASEC, and an additional 37.0% (n = 17/46) remained asymptomatic during the ASEC but then developed symptoms during the DSEC. The ASEC alone may not detect symptom provocation in a significant proportion of concussion patients who otherwise would develop symptoms during a DSEC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]