학술논문

The Effect of Epistemic Cognition Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis
Document Type
Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Information Analyses
Author
Cartiff, Brian M. (ORCID 0000-0003-2609-8408); Duke, Rebekah F. (ORCID 0000-0001-8448-664X); Greene, Jeffrey A. (ORCID 0000-0003-4145-1847)
Source
Journal of Educational Psychology. Apr 2021 113(3):477-498.
Subject
Academic Achievement
Meta Analysis
Epistemology
Schemata (Cognition)
Thinking Skills
Intervention
Teaching Methods
Research Reports
Futures (of Society)
Educational Trends
Language
English
ISSN
0022-0663
Abstract
Epistemic cognition involves the thinking executed as people discern what they know versus what they question, doubt, or disbelieve. Effective or adaptive epistemic cognition underlies the higher-order thinking required for life in the 21st century and has been positively correlated with academic achievement. As such, researchers have designed a number of educational interventions with the goal of developing students' epistemic cognition, but no comprehensive examination of their efficacy exists. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to better understand the effect of epistemic cognition interventions upon academic achievement and what characteristics differentiated their efficacy. Twenty-six experimental and quasi-experimental studies met our inclusion criteria. Using 28 independent samples and 59 effect sizes, we found epistemic cognition interventions had a statistically significant, medium-level effect on academic achievement (Cohen's d = 0.509, p < 0.001). Moderator analyses revealed interventions based in guided forms of instruction and models emphasizing justification and reconciliation of objectivity and subjectivity were more successful than other interventions, suggesting several promising directions for future research and practice. Surprisingly, we found that shorter interventions were generally more successful in promoting academic performance than longer ones.