학술논문

Patient-level comparison of heart failure patients in clinical phenotype and prognosis from China and Sweden
Document Type
Source
Bmc Cardiovascular Disorders. 22(1)
Subject
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Kardiologi
Heart failure
China
Sweden
Therapy
Prognosis
reduced ejection fraction
outcomes
epidemiology
management
guidelines
registry
asia
esc
collaboration
diagnosis
Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
Language
English
ISSN
1471-2261
Abstract
Background Clinical phenotype and prognosis of heart failure (HF) may be variable among different racial populations. Therefore, a patient-level comparison of hospitalized HF patients in two university hospitals from China and Sweden was performed. Methods and results This study was a pooled data analysis of the patients prospectively enrolled in two single-center studies in China (n = 949) and Sweden (n = 1639) from 2011 to 2015. Clinical characteristics and 6-month all-cause mortality were collected. Higher systolic blood pressure (126.1 +/- 20.3 vs. 114.2 +/- 15.4 mmHg, p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP level (4540 vs. 3251 pg/mL, p = 0.013) were found in the Swedish cohort, also more patients with ischemic heart disease (32.0% vs. 19.2%), hypertension (64.2% vs. 36.8%), valvular heart disease (40.9% vs.31.6%) and atrial fibrillation (55.3% vs. 39.6%) (all p < 0.001). The use of ACEIs/ARBs (48.8% vs. 80.8%) or beta-blockers (58.8% vs. 86.5%) (both p < 0.001) was lower in Chinese cohort. Given younger age in Chinese cohort (61.6 vs. 76.4 years, p < 0.001), age-stratified analyses were conducted, as there were similar patient numbers in 50-74 years in Chinese (n = 550) and Swedish (n = 554) cohorts, therefore baseline characteristics and prognosis were further compared. The age- and sex-adjusted outcome (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.55-1.19], p = 0.273) was comparable between the two populations. The NT-proBNP and eGFR independently predicted 6-month mortality in both Chinese (HR [95% CI] 1.006 [1.003-1.008], 0.986 [0.976-0.999]) and Swedish cohort (1.003 [1.000-1.007], 0.988 [0.976-0.999]). Conclusions Patient-level comparison of real-world HF populations from China and Sweden demonstrated different clinical phenotypes and therapy but similar prognosis and their predictors.