학술논문

Investigation of acidic matter emissions at the Niles Generating Station
Document Type
Conference
Author
Source
Proc., Annu. Meet., Air Pollut. Control Assoc.; (United States); 83-41.2; Conference: 76. annual meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association, Atlanta, GA, USA, 19 Jun 1983
Subject
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
PARTICULATES
MONITORING
SULFURIC ACID
DEPOSITION
EMISSION
AMMONIA
COAL
OHIO
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS
CONTROL
ENERGY SOURCES
EQUIPMENT
FEDERAL REGION V
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
HYDRIDES
HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS
INORGANIC ACIDS
MATERIALS
NITROGEN COMPOUNDS
NITROGEN HYDRIDES
NORTH AMERICA
PARTICLES
POLLUTION CONTROL
POWER PLANTS
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
USA 500200* -- Environment, Atmospheric-- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport-- (-1989)
010900 -- Coal, Lignite, & Peat-- Environmental Aspects
Language
English
Abstract
Until recently, the Ohio Edison Niles Generating Station operated particulate control equipment with an efficiency of about 70%. To comply with existing law, particulate emissions have now been reduced to less than 0.1 lbatmmBtu. While this has greatly improved the total suspended particulate levels in the vicinity of the plant, a new phenomenon has occurred requiring additional attention to emissions from the plant. The acidic matter emissions problem at Niles Plant was approached with the purpose of investigating all aspects of the problem. The testing of acids on car paint finishes indicated the type of damage that can be done by varying degrees of acidic solutions. The painted samples, when compared to car damage at the plant, verified the type of acid and strength of solution which caused the damage. Sulfuric acid was the main contributor. It also verified that other types of damage on the cars were not caused by the acidic matter. The analysis of deposits found in the ductwork and chimney showed that corrosion was not significant in the ducts. It also showed that ammonia, as was initially used to control the problem, was not sufficiently neutralizing the ash deposits in the chimney. That indicated that an intermittent use of ammonia was not sufficient to eliminate the problem.