학술논문

Chrysler Corp. v. EPA, 631 F. 2d 865 (DC Cir. 1980)
Document Type
Journal Article
Author
Source
Environ. Law; (United States); 11:3
Subject
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY
33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS AUTOMOBILES
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
CATALYTIC CONVERTERS
LEGAL ASPECTS
CLEAN AIR ACT
COMPLIANCE
LAWSUITS
PERFORMANCE TESTING
EQUIPMENT
LAWS
POLLUTION LAWS
TESTING
VEHICLES 290300* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Environment, Health, & Safety
330702 -- Emission Control-- Carbon Monoxide
Language
English
Abstract
The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments require prototype automobiles to pass a three-stage Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emission performance test before they go on the market. Chrysler challenged section 207 (c)(1) after its 1975 model failed the third test and was threatened with an order to recall and repair its catalytic converters. The law specifying recall and repair when failure occurs in spite of proper vehicle maintenance and use was intended to allocate responsibility for meeting compliance standards. Chrysler contended that the cars in question had not been maintained according to their specifications. In deciding against Chrysler, the Court supported the legislative goal of forcing technological progress in emission control. A critique of this decision suggests that it opens the way for manufacturers to seek amendments that will dilute the Clean Air Act. (DCK)