학술논문

In situ combustion combined with water flooding. Part 1
Document Type
Journal Article
Author
Source
Pet. Eng.; (United States); 37:7
Subject
02 PETROLEUM IN-SITU COMBUSTION
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
OIL WELLS
WATERFLOODING
CORROSION
ECONOMICS
EMULSIONS
ENHANCED RECOVERY
PETROLEUM
WELL STIMULATION
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
COLLOIDS
COMBUSTION
DISPERSIONS
ENERGY SOURCES
FLUID INJECTION
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
IN-SITU PROCESSING
OXIDATION
PROCESSING
RECOVERY
STIMULATION
THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES
WELLS 020300* -- Petroleum-- Drilling & Production
Language
English
Abstract
It is feasible to switch from in-situ combustion to water injection as a recovery process for viscous crude oil. By combining a combustion drive with waterflooding, economics of operation are possible. Cost of air is one of the limiting factors in pattern design and application of combustion drives. Also, emulsions, corrosion, and high temperature failures are potential problems in producing wells in the combustion pattern. Switching to a waterflood would substitute the costs of water injection for those of air injection and associated producing well problems. In making the switch from air to water injection, some additional equipment may be needed. This may be in addition to or may eliminate some of the equipment necessary for a combustion drive alone. Results of tests described here indicate that while the switch from air to water offers operational advantages, overall recoveries would be less. Therefore, an economic balance can be made to determine when the switch from air to water injection should be made.