학술논문

Self-Organization of Interprofessional Staff to Improve Mobility of Hospitalized Patients with STRIDE: a Complexity Science-Informed Qualitative Study
Document Type
Original Paper
Source
Journal of General Internal Medicine. 37(16):4216-4222
Subject
complexity science
implementation science
inpatient mobility
qualitative research
Language
English
ISSN
0884-8734
1525-1497
Abstract
Background: Inpatient mobility programs can help older adults maintain function during hospitalization. Changing hospital practice can be complex and require engagement of various staff levels and disciplines; however, we know little about how interprofessional teams organize around implementing such interventions. Complexity science can inform approaches to understanding and improving multidisciplinary collaboration to implement clinical programs.Objective: To examine, through a complexity science lens, how clinical staff’s understanding about roles in promoting inpatient mobility evolved during implementation of the STRIDE (assiSTed eaRly mobIlity for hospitalizeD older vEterans) hospital mobility program.Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.Participants: Ninety-two clinical staff at eight Veterans Affairs hospitals.Interventions: STRIDE is a supervised walking program for hospitalized older adults designed to maintain patients’ mobility and function.Approach: We interviewed key staff involved in inpatient mobility efforts at each STRIDE site in pre- and post-implementation periods. Interviews elicited staff’s perception of complexity-science aspects of inpatient mobility teams (e.g., roles over time, team composition). We analyzed data using complexity science-informed qualitative content analysis.Key Results: We identified three key themes related to patterns of self-organization: (1) individuals outside of the “core” STRIDE team voluntarily assumed roles as STRIDE advocates, (2) leader-champions adapted their engagement level to match local implementation team needs during implementation, and (3) continued leadership support and physical therapy involvement were key factors for sustainment.Conclusions: Staff self-organized around implementation of a new clinical program in ways that were responsive to changing program and contextual needs. These findings demonstrate the importance of effective self-organization for clinical program implementation. Researchers and practitioners implementing clinical programs should allow for, and encourage, flexibility in staff roles in planning for implementation of a new clinical program, encourage the development of advocates, and engage leaders in program planning and sustainment efforts.