부산대학교 도서관

Introduction: Labor force outcomes in LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) populations often compare unfavorably with those of cisgender, heterosexual peers across OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries. Persistent discrimination often emerges as a likely predictor of these disparities, and multiple OECD countries have implemented measures to address differences in labor force outcomes (i.e., income, unemployment). However, there has been no prior review of the literature that systematically and comprehensively identifies measures that address these labor force outcome disparities.Method: The current study used a scoping review protocol to identify publications included in journals from January 1, 2000, to June 5, 2022, across seven databases that identified interventions used to address differences in labor force outcomes for LGBT individuals in OECD countries. An updated search identified journals from January 1, 2000, to August 1, 2023.Results: From 7841 identified publications, 54 met criteria for data extraction. Underlying themes across these 54 articles were identified via thematic analysis and included state policy (n = 17), workplace policy (n = 28), mentorship (n = 4), and interventions for unemployed LGBT individuals (n = 5).Policy Implications: The current review summarizes that legal and policy interventions meaningfully improve labor force outcomes for LGBT individuals. We suggest an intersectional approach that construes program-based interventions as complementary to legislation and policy. The current study also holds implications for global policy, though future studies should consider policy in non-OECD countries, as well.Conclusion: Ultimately, interventions to address societal homophobia, biphobia, and transphobia, alongside intersecting forms of discrimination, are necessary before disparities in labor market outcomes for LGBT people will be dismantled.