학술논문
Experts’ recommendations in laser use for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) group
Document Type
Original Paper
Author
Ortner, Gernot; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar; Güven, Selcuk; Kitzbichler, Gerhard; Traxer, Olivier; Giusti, Guido; Proietti, Silvia; Liatsikos, Evangelos; Kallidonis, Panagiotis; Ulvik, Øyvind; Goumas, Ioannis Kartalas; Duvdevani, Mordechai; Baard, Joyce; Kamphuis, Guido M.; Ferretti, Stefania; Dragos, Laurian; Villa, Luca; Miernik, Arkadiusz; Tailly, Thomas; Pietropaolo, Amelia; Hamri, Saeed Bin; Papatsoris, Athanasios; Gözen, Ali Serdar; Herrmann, Thomas R. W.; Nagele, Udo; Tokas, Theodoros
Source
World Journal of Urology. 41(11):3367-3376
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1433-8726
Abstract
Purpose: To highlight and compare experts’ laser settings during endoscopic laser treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), to identify measures to reduce complications, and to propose guidance for endourologists.Methods: Following a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, a survey was sent to laser experts. We asked participants for typical settings during specific scenarios (ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous treatment). These settings were compared among the reported laser types to find common settings and limits. Additionally, we identified preventive measures commonly applied during surgery.Results: Twenty experts completed the survey, needing a mean time of 12.7 min. Overall, most common laser type was Holmium–Yttrium–Aluminum–Garnet (Ho:YAG) (70%, 14/20) followed by Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (45%, 9/20), pulsed Thulium–Yttrium–Aluminum–Garnet (Tm:YAG) (3/20, 15%), and continuous wave (cw)Tm:YAG (1/20, 5%). Pulse energy for the treatment of distal ureteral tumors was significantly different with median settings of 0.9 J, 1 J and 0.45 J for Ho:YAG, TFL and pulsed Tm:YAG, respectively (p = 0.048). During URS and RIRS, pulse shapes were significantly different, with Ho:YAG being used in long pulse and TFL in short pulse mode (all p < 0.05). We did not find further disparities.Conclusion: Ho:YAG is used by most experts, while TFL is the most promising alternative. Laser settings largely do not vary significantly. However, further research with novel lasers is necessary to define the optimal approach. With the recent introduction of small caliber and more flexible scopes, minimal-invasive UTUC treatment is further undergoing an extension of applicability in appropriately selected patients.