학술논문

Genome Sequencing of SHH Medulloblastoma Predicts Genotype-Related Response to Smoothened Inhibition
Document Type
article
Source
Cancer Cell. 25(3)
Subject
Biological Sciences
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Neurosciences
Pediatric Research Initiative
Genetics
Rare Diseases
Cancer
Pediatric
Brain Cancer
Pediatric Cancer
Brain Disorders
Adolescent
Adult
Animals
Base Sequence
Biphenyl Compounds
Cerebellar Neoplasms
Child
Child
Preschool
DEAD-box RNA Helicases
DNA Copy Number Variations
Drug Resistance
Neoplasm
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Hedgehog Proteins
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Infant
Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors
Male
Medulloblastoma
Mice
Mice
Inbred NOD
Mice
SCID
Molecular Sequence Data
N-Myc Proto-Oncogene Protein
Neoplasm Transplantation
Nuclear Proteins
Oncogene Proteins
Patched Receptors
Patched-1 Receptor
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
Promoter Regions
Genetic
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
Pyridines
Receptors
Cell Surface
Receptors
G-Protein-Coupled
Repressor Proteins
Signal Transduction
Smoothened Receptor
Telomerase
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
Young Adult
Zinc Finger Protein Gli2
ICGC PedBrain Tumor Project
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Biochemistry and cell biology
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
Smoothened (SMO) inhibitors recently entered clinical trials for sonic-hedgehog-driven medulloblastoma (SHH-MB). Clinical response is highly variable. To understand the mechanism(s) of primary resistance and identify pathways cooperating with aberrant SHH signaling, we sequenced and profiled a large cohort of SHH-MBs (n = 133). SHH pathway mutations involved PTCH1 (across all age groups), SUFU (infants, including germline), and SMO (adults). Children >3 years old harbored an excess of downstream MYCN and GLI2 amplifications and frequent TP53 mutations, often in the germline, all of which were rare in infants and adults. Functional assays in different SHH-MB xenograft models demonstrated that SHH-MBs harboring a PTCH1 mutation were responsive to SMO inhibition, whereas tumors harboring an SUFU mutation or MYCN amplification were primarily resistant.