학술논문

THE STRUCTURED CLINICAL INTERVIEW FOR COMPLICATED GRIEF: RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
Document Type
article
Source
Depression and Anxiety. 32(7)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Psychology
Mental Health
Depression
Neurodegenerative
Clinical Research
Brain Disorders
Behavioral and Social Science
Mental health
Adult
Factor Analysis
Statistical
Female
Grief
Humans
Interview
Psychological
Male
Middle Aged
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Reproducibility of Results
grief
bereavement
complicated grief
assessment
diagnosis
depression
anxiety
anxiety disorders
PTSD
posttraumatic stress disorder
PTSD/posttraumatic stress disorder
anxiety/anxiety disorders
assessment/diagnosis
grief/bereavement/complicated grief
Psychiatry
Clinical sciences
Clinical and health psychology
Social and personality psychology
Language
Abstract
BackgroundComplicated grief (CG) has been recently included in the DSM-5, under the term "persistent complex bereavement disorder," as a condition requiring further study. To our knowledge, no psychometric data on any structured clinical interview for CG (SCI-CG) is available to date. In this manuscript, we introduce the SCI-CG, a 31-item "SCID-like" clinician-administered instrument to assess the presence of CG symptoms.MethodsParticipants were 281 treatment-seeking adults with CG (77.9% [n = 219] women, mean age = 52.4, standard deviation [SD] = 17.8) who were assessed with the SCI-CG and measures of depression, posttraumatic stress, anxiety, functional impairment.ResultsThe SCI-CG exhibited satisfactory internal consistency (α = .78), good test-retest reliability (interclass correlation [ICC] 0.68, 95% CI [0.60-0.75]), and excellent interrater reliability (ICC = 0.95, 95% CI [0.89-0.98]). Exploratory factor analyses revealed that a five-factor structure, explaining 50.3% of the total variance, was the best fit for the data.ConclusionsThe clinician-rated SCI-CG demonstrates good internal consistency, reliability, and convergent validity in treatment-seeking individuals with CG and therefore can be a useful tool to assess CG. Although diagnostic criteria for CG have yet to be adequately validated, the SCI-CG may facilitate this process. The SCI-CG can now be used as a validated instrument in research and clinical practice.