학술논문

American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines
Document Type
article
Source
CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 63(2)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Prevention
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Lung
Cancer
Health Services
Tobacco
Clinical Research
Lung Cancer
Tobacco Smoke and Health
Biomedical Imaging
Respiratory
Good Health and Well Being
Aged
American Cancer Society
Early Detection of Cancer
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
Mass Screening
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Smoking
Smoking Cessation
Tomography
X-Ray Computed
United States
humans
lung neoplasms
mortality
radiography
radiation dosage
randomized controlled trials as topic
risk
risk reduction behavior
x-ray
computed tomography
adverse effects
lung cancer screening
Clinical Sciences
Public Health and Health Services
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
Findings from the National Cancer Institute's National Lung Screening Trial established that lung cancer mortality in specific high-risk groups can be reduced by annual screening with low-dose computed tomography. These findings indicate that the adoption of lung cancer screening could save many lives. Based on the results of the National Lung Screening Trial, the American Cancer Society is issuing an initial guideline for lung cancer screening. This guideline recommends that clinicians with access to high-volume, high-quality lung cancer screening and treatment centers should initiate a discussion about screening with apparently healthy patients aged 55 years to 74 years who have at least a 30-pack-year smoking history and who currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. A process of informed and shared decision-making with a clinician related to the potential benefits, limitations, and harms associated with screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography should occur before any decision is made to initiate lung cancer screening. Smoking cessation counseling remains a high priority for clinical attention in discussions with current smokers, who should be informed of their continuing risk of lung cancer. Screening should not be viewed as an alternative to smoking cessation.