학술논문

Temporoparietal Hypometabolism in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Associated Imaging Diagnostic Errors
Document Type
article
Source
JAMA Neurology. 68(3)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Acquired Cognitive Impairment
Neurodegenerative
Brain Disorders
Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD)
Clinical Research
Aging
Dementia
Alzheimer's Disease
Neurosciences
Biomedical Imaging
Detection
screening and diagnosis
4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies
4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
Neurological
Adult
Age of Onset
Aged
Alzheimer Disease
Brain
Diagnosis
Differential
Diagnostic Errors
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
Humans
Image Processing
Computer-Assisted
Male
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Observer Variation
Parietal Lobe
Positron-Emission Tomography
Radiopharmaceuticals
Reproducibility of Results
Temporal Lobe
Cognitive Sciences
Neurology & Neurosurgery
Clinical sciences
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the cause of diagnostic errors in the visual interpretation of positron emission tomographic scans with fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG-PET) in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and patients with Alzheimer disease (AD).DesignTwelve trained raters unaware of clinical and autopsy information independently reviewed FDG-PET scans and provided their diagnostic impression and confidence of either FTLD or AD. Six of these raters also recorded whether metabolism appeared normal or abnormal in 5 predefined brain regions in each hemisphere-frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, anterior temporal cortex, temporoparietal cortex, and posterior cingulate cortex. Results were compared with neuropathological diagnoses.SettingAcademic medical centers.PatientsForty-five patients with pathologically confirmed FTLD (n=14) or AD (n=31).ResultsRaters had a high degree of diagnostic accuracy in the interpretation of FDG-PET scans; however, raters consistently found some scans more difficult to interpret than others. Unanimity of diagnosis among the raters was more frequent in patients with AD (27 of 31 patients [87%]) than in patients with FTLD (7 of 14 patients [50%]) (P=.02). Disagreements in interpretation of scans in patients with FTLD largely occurred when there was temporoparietal hypometabolism, which was present in 7 of the 14 FTLD scans and 6 of the 7 scans lacking unanimity. Hypometabolism of anterior cingulate and anterior temporal regions had higher specificities and positive likelihood ratios for FTLD than temporoparietal hypometabolism had for AD.ConclusionsTemporoparietal hypometabolism in FTLD is common and may cause inaccurate interpretation of FDG-PET scans. An interpretation paradigm that focuses on the absence of hypometabolism in regions typically affected in AD before considering FTLD is likely to misclassify a significant portion of FTLD scans. Anterior cingulate and/or anterior temporal hypometabolism indicates a high likelihood of FTLD, even when temporoparietal hypometabolism is present. Ultimately, the accurate interpretation of FDG-PET scans in patients with dementia cannot rest on the presence or absence of a single region of hypometabolism but rather must take into account the relative hypometabolism of all brain regions.