학술논문

Reducing police occupational needle stick injury risk following an interactive training: the SHIELD cohort study in Mexico
Document Type
article
Source
BMJ Open. 11(4)
Subject
Public Health
Health Sciences
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Clinical Research
Prevention
3.1 Primary prevention interventions to modify behaviours or promote wellbeing
Prevention of disease and conditions
and promotion of well-being
Good Health and Well Being
Clinical Sciences
Public Health and Health Services
Other Medical and Health Sciences
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Psychology
Language
Abstract
Objective: At a time of unprecedented attention to the public health impact of policing, it is imperative to understand the role of occupational safety in shaping officer behaviours. We assessed the longitudinal impact of police training in a quasi-experimental hybrid type-1 trial to reduce syringe-related occupational risk, while realigning police practices with public health prevention among people who inject drugs (PWID). Setting: Tijuana, Mexico. Participants: Of 1806 Tijuana municipal police trainees, 771 reporting previous exposure to syringes were randomly selected for follow-up. All participants completed at least one follow-up visit; attrition at 24 months was 8%. Intervention: Between 2015 and 2016, officers received a training intervention (Safety and Health Integration in the Enforcement of Laws on Drugs, SHIELD) bundling occupational needle stick injury (NSI) prevention with health promotion among PWID. Outcome measures: Longitudinal analysis with generalised linear mixed models to evaluate training impact on occupational NSI risk via NSI incidence and prevalidated Syringe Threat and Injury Correlates (STIC) score. This composite indicator integrates five self-reported risky syringe-handling practices (eg, syringe confiscation, breaking) and was used as a proxy for NSI risk due to reporting bias and concerns about reliability of NSI incidence reports. Results: No change in self-reported NSI incidence was observed, but significant reductions in risk (16.2% decrease in STIC score) occurred at 3 months, with a sustained decrease of 17.8% through 24 months, compared with pretraining (p