학술논문

Improving outcomes after pediatric cardiac arrest – the ICU-Resuscitation Project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Document Type
article
Source
Trials. 19(1)
Subject
Health Services and Systems
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Health Sciences
Clinical Research
Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Heart Disease
Pediatric
Cardiovascular
Adolescent
Age Factors
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Child
Child
Preschool
Female
Heart Arrest
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Infant
Infant
Newborn
Inservice Training
Intensive Care Units
Pediatric
Male
Medical Staff
Hospital
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Patient Care Team
Point-of-Care Systems
Quality Improvement
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Cardiac arrest
In-hospital
Survival
Hybrid
Stepped-wedge
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network
Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Cardiovascular System & Hematology
General & Internal Medicine
Clinical sciences
Epidemiology
Health services and systems
Language
Abstract
BackgroundQuality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with survival, but recommended guidelines are often not met, and less than half the children with an in-hospital arrest will survive to discharge. A single-center before-and-after study demonstrated that outcomes may be improved with a novel training program in which all pediatric intensive care unit staff are encouraged to participate in frequent CPR refresher training and regular, structured resuscitation debriefings focused on patient-centric physiology.Methods/designThis ongoing trial will assess whether a program of structured debriefings and point-of-care bedside practice that emphasizes physiologic resuscitation targets improves the rate of survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic outcome in children receiving CPR in the intensive care unit. This study is designed as a hybrid stepped-wedge trial in which two of ten participating hospitals are randomly assigned to enroll in the intervention group and two are assigned to enroll in the control group for the duration of the trial. The remaining six hospitals enroll initially in the control group but will transition to enrolling in the intervention group at randomly assigned staggered times during the enrollment period.DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the first implementation of a hybrid stepped-wedge design. It was chosen over a traditional stepped-wedge design because the resulting improvement in statistical power reduces the required enrollment by 9 months (14%). However, this design comes with additional challenges, including logistics of implementing an intervention prior to the start of enrollment. Nevertheless, if results from the single-center pilot are confirmed in this trial, it will have a profound effect on CPR training and quality improvement initiatives.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02837497 . Registered on July 19, 2016.