학술논문

Reliability, validity and responsiveness to change of the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis
Document Type
article
Source
Rheumatology. 54(8)
Subject
Clinical Research
Lung
Respiratory
Adult
Diagnosis
Differential
Disability Evaluation
Dyspnea
Female
Humans
Incidence
Longitudinal Studies
Lung Diseases
Interstitial
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Respiratory Function Tests
Scleroderma
Diffuse
Skin Diseases
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tomography
X-Ray Computed
Visual Analog Scale
scleroderma and related disorders
respiratory
quality of life
patient attitude to health
autoinflammatory conditions
systemic sclerosis
dyspnoea
patient-reported outcomes
Clinical Sciences
Immunology
Public Health and Health Services
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveDyspnoea is a common, multifactorial source of functional impairment among patients with dcSSc. Our objective was to assess the reliability, construct validity and responsiveness to change of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in patients with early dcSSc participating in a multicentre prospective study.MethodsAt enrolment and 1 year, patients completed the SGRQ (a multi-item instrument with four scales: symptoms, activity, impact and total), a visual analogue scale (VAS) for breathing and the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and underwent 6 min walk distance and pulmonary function tests, physician and patient global health assessments and high-resolution CT (HRCT). We assessed internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's α. For validity we examined the ability of the SGRQ to differentiate the presence vs absence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on HRCT or restrictive lung disease and evaluated the 1 year responsiveness to change using pulmonary function tests and patient- and physician-reported anchors. Correlation coefficients of 0.24-0.36 were considered moderate and >0.37 was considered large.ResultsA total of 177 patients were evaluated. Reliability was satisfactory for all SGRQ scales (0.70-0.93). All scales showed large correlations with the VAS for breathing and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide in the overall cohort and in the subgroup with ILD. Three of the four scales in the overall cohort and the total scale in the ILD subgroup showed moderate to large correlation with the HAQ-DI and the predicted forced vital capacity (r = 0.33-0.44). Each scale discriminated between the presence and absence of ILD and restrictive lung disease (P ≤ 0.0001-0.03). At follow-up, all scales were responsive to change using different anchors.ConclusionThe SGRQ has acceptable reliability, construct validity and responsiveness to change for use in a dcSSc population and differentiates between patients with and without ILD.