학술논문

Assessment of long‐term outcomes post living liver donation highlights the importance of scientific integrity when presenting transplant registry data
Document Type
article
Source
American Journal of Transplantation. 22(6)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Immunology
Organ Transplantation
Digestive Diseases
Transplantation
Clinical Research
Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis
Rare Diseases
Liver Disease
Humans
Liver
Liver Transplantation
Living Donors
Registries
Transplants
living donation
living donor liver transplantation
NALLDIG Consortium*
Medical and Health Sciences
Surgery
Clinical sciences
Language
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation has expanded in recent years, particularly in North America. As experience with this procedure has matured over the last 25 years, centers are increasingly faced with potential living donors who are more medically complex. As donors move through the evaluation process, completing the informed consent process continues to be challenged by a paucity of granular data demonstrating long-term outcomes and overall safety specifically in the otherwise "healthy" living liver donor population. Two recently published studies examined long-term outcomes post-living liver donation using Korean registry data and reported similar results, with excellent overall survival when compared to appropriately matched controls. However, the authors of these studies were presented differently, with one reporting an alarmist view based on one aspect of a suboptimal analysis approach using an inappropriate comparator group. Herein, the North American Living Liver Donor Innovation Group (NALLDIG) consortium discusses these two studies and their potential impact on living liver donation in North America, ultimately highlighting the importance of scientific integrity in data presentation and dissemination when using transplant registry data.