학술논문

Controlled trial of a workplace sales ban on sugar-sweetened beverages
Document Type
article
Source
Public Health Nutrition. 26(10)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Public Health
Health Sciences
Nutrition and Dietetics
Prevention
Clinical Research
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
3.1 Primary prevention interventions to modify behaviours or promote wellbeing
Prevention of disease and conditions
and promotion of well-being
Cardiovascular
Metabolic and endocrine
Good Health and Well Being
Humans
Sugar-Sweetened Beverages
Beverages
Workplace
Cardiovascular Diseases
Obesity prevention
Workplace interventions
Sugar-sweetened beverages
Diabetes prevention
Food environments
Medical and Health Sciences
Nutrition & Dietetics
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveTo examine the effectiveness of a workplace sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) sales ban on reducing SSB consumption in employees, including those with cardiometabolic disease risk factors.DesignA controlled trial of ethnically diverse, full-time employees who consumed SSB heavily (sales ban n 315; control n 342). Outcomes included standardised measures of change in SSB consumption in the workplace (primary) and at home between baseline and 6 months post-sales ban.SettingSutter Health, a large non-profit healthcare delivery system in Northern California.ParticipantsFull-time employees at Sutter Health screened for heavy SSB consumption.ResultsParticipants were 66·1 % non-White. On average, participants consumed 34·7 ounces (about 1 litre) of SSB per d, and the majority had an elevated baseline BMI (mean = 29·5). In adjusted regression analyses, those exposed to a workplace SSB sales ban for 6 months consumed 2·7 (95 % CI -4·9, -0·5) fewer ounces of SSB per d while at work, and 4·3 (95 % CI -8·4, -0·2) fewer total ounces per d, compared to controls. Sales ban participants with an elevated BMI or waist circumference had greater post-intervention reductions in workplace SSB consumption.ConclusionsWorkplace sales bans can reduce SSB consumption in ethnically diverse employee populations, including those at higher risk for cardiometabolic disease.