학술논문
Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016
Document Type
article
Author
Atwater, Amber Reck; Petty, Amy J; Liu, Beiyu; Green, Cynthia L; Silverberg, Jonathan I; DeKoven, Joel G; Belsito, Donald V; Reeder, Margo J; Sasseville, Denis; Taylor, James S; Maibach, Howard I; Zirwas, Matthew J; Marks, James G; Zug, Kathryn A; Fowler, Joseph F; Pratt, Melanie D; DeLeo, Vincent A; Warshaw, Erin M
Source
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 84(4)
Subject
Language
Abstract
BackgroundPreservatives are often necessary components of commercial products. Large-scale North American studies on preservative allergy are limited.ObjectiveTo evaluate demographics, positive patch test reactions (PPTRs), clinical relevance, and trends for preservatives tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch testing results of preservatives from 1994 through 2016.ResultsA total of 50,799 patients were tested; 11,338 (22.3%) had a PPTR to at least 1 preservative. The most frequent reactions were to methylisothiazolinone 0.2% aqueous (aq) (12.2%), formaldehyde 2% aq (7.8%), formaldehyde 1% aq (7.8%), quaternium-15 2% petrolatum (pet) (7.7%), and methyldibromo glutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol 2% pet (5.1%). Paraben mix 12% pet (1%), iodopropynyl butylcarbamate 0.1% pet (0.4%), benzyl alcohol 1% pet (0.3%), and phenoxyethanol 1% pet (0.2%) had the lowest PPTRs. Linear regression analysis of preservatives tested showed that only methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 0.01% aq (parameter estimate, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-0.66; P