학술논문

Models for Predicting Recurrence, Complications, and Health Status in Women After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
Document Type
article
Source
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 132(2)
Subject
Reproductive Medicine
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Patient Safety
Contraception/Reproduction
Clinical Research
Prevention
Cohort Studies
Female
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Health Status
Humans
Logistic Models
Models
Statistical
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recurrence
Reoperation
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Suburethral Slings
Urinary Incontinence
Stress
Uterine Prolapse
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
Reproductive medicine
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveTo develop statistical models predicting recurrent pelvic organ prolapse, surgical complications, and change in health status 12 months after apical prolapse surgery.MethodsLogistic regression models were developed using a combined cohort from three randomized trials and two prospective cohort studies from 1,301 participants enrolled in surgical studies conducted by the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Composite recurrent prolapse was defined as prolapse beyond the hymen; the presence of bothersome bulge symptoms; or prolapse reoperation or retreatment within 12 months after surgery. Complications were defined as any serious adverse event or Dindo grade III complication within 12 months of surgery. Significant change in health status was defined as a minimum important change of SF-6D utility score (±0.035 points) from baseline. Thirty-two candidate risk factors were considered for each model and model accuracy was measured using concordance indices. All indices were internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap resamples to correct for bias.ResultsThe models accurately predicted composite recurrent prolapse (concordance index=0.72, 95% CI 0.69-0.76), bothersome vaginal bulge (concordance index=0.73, 95% CI 0.68-0.77), prolapse beyond the hymen (concordance index=0.74, 95% CI 0.70-0.77), serious adverse event (concordance index=0.60, 95% CI 0.56-0.64), Dindo grade III or greater complication (concordance index=0.62, 95% CI 0.58-0.66), and health status improvement (concordance index=0.64, 95% CI 0.62-0.67) or worsening (concordance index=0.63, 95% CI 0.60-0.67). Calibration curves demonstrated all models were accurate through clinically useful predicted probabilities.ConclusionThese prediction models are able to provide accurate and discriminating estimates of prolapse recurrence, complications, and health status 12 months after prolapse surgery.