학술논문

Association Between 2010 Medicare Reform and Inpatient Rehabilitation Access in People With Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of the American Heart Association. 10(16)
Subject
Brain Disorders
Rehabilitation
Behavioral and Social Science
Aging
Stroke
Health Services
Clinical Research
Adult
Aged
Aged
80 and over
Cerebral Hemorrhage
Female
Health Care Reform
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Inpatients
Male
Medicare
Middle Aged
Outcome and Process Assessment
Health Care
Patient Discharge
Policy Making
Prospective Payment System
Registries
Rehabilitation Centers
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
healthcare policy
inpatient rehabilitation facility
intracerebral hemorrhage
outcome
rehabilitation
skilled nursing facility
Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Language
Abstract
Background Evidence suggests intracerebral hemorrhage survivors have earlier recovery compared with ischemic stroke survivors. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services prospective payment system instituted documentation rules for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) in 2010, with the goal of optimizing patient selection. We investigated whether these requirements limited IRF and increased skilled nursing facility (SNF) use compared with home discharge. Methods and Results Intracerebral hemorrhage discharges to IRF, SNF, or home were estimated using GWTG (Get With The Guidelines) Stroke registry data between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015 (n=265 444). Binary hierarchical models determined associations between the 2010 Rule and discharge setting; subgroup analyses evaluated age, geographic region, and hospital type. From January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009, 45.5% of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage had home discharge, 22.2% went to SNF, and 32.3% went to IRF. After January 1, 2010, there was a 1.06% absolute increase in home discharge, a 0.46% increase in SNF, and a 1.52% decline in IRF. The adjusted odds of IRF versus home discharge decreased 3% after 2010 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00). Lower odds of IRF versus home discharge were observed in people aged