학술논문

A randomised, controlled comparison of latanoprostene bunod and latanoprost 0.005% in the treatment of ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma: the VOYAGER study
Document Type
article
Source
British Journal of Ophthalmology. 99(6)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Ophthalmology and Optometry
Aging
Neurosciences
Eye Disease and Disorders of Vision
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Clinical Research
Patient Safety
Neurodegenerative
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Adult
Aged
Aged
80 and over
Antihypertensive Agents
Double-Blind Method
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma
Open-Angle
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Latanoprost
Male
Middle Aged
Ocular Hypertension
Ophthalmic Solutions
Prostaglandins F
Synthetic
Tonometry
Ocular
Visual Acuity
Young Adult
VOYAGER study group
Clinical Trial
Drugs
Glaucoma
Intraocular pressure
Treatment Medical
Clinical Sciences
Opthalmology and Optometry
Public Health and Health Services
Ophthalmology & Optometry
Clinical sciences
Ophthalmology and optometry
Language
Abstract
AimTo assess the efficacy and safety of latanoprostene bunod (LBN) compared with latanoprost 0.005%, and to determine the optimum drug concentration(s) of LBN in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in subjects with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.MethodsRandomised, investigator-masked, parallel-group, dose-ranging study. Subjects instilled one drop of study medication in the study eye once daily each evening for 28 days and completed five study visits. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in mean diurnal IOP at Day 28.ResultsOf the 413 subjects randomised (LBN 0.006%, n=82; LBN 0.012%, n=85; LBN 0.024%, n=83; LBN 0.040%, n=81; latanoprost, n=82), 396 subjects completed the study. Efficacy for LBN was dose-dependent reaching a plateau at 0.024%-0.040%. LBN 0.024% led to significantly greater reductions in diurnal IOP compared with latanoprost at the primary endpoint, Day 28 (p=0.005), as well as Days 7 (p=0.033) and 14 (p=0.015). The incidence of adverse events, mostly mild and transient, was numerically higher in the LBN treatment groups compared with the latanoprost group. Hyperaemia was similar across treatments.ConclusionsLBN 0.024% dosed once daily was the lower of the two most effective concentrations evaluated, with significantly greater IOP lowering and comparable side effects relative to latanoprost 0.005%. LBN dosed once daily for 28 days was well tolerated.Clinical trial numberNCT01223378.