학술논문

Influence of Educational Background, Childhood Socioeconomic Environment, and Language Use on Cognition among Spanish-Speaking Latinos Living Near the US–Mexico Border
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 28(8)
Subject
Public Health
Health Sciences
Prevention
Clinical Research
Basic Behavioral and Social Science
Brain Disorders
Neurosciences
Behavioral and Social Science
Pediatric
Quality Education
Child
Cognition
Educational Status
Female
Hispanic or Latino
Humans
Language
Male
Mexico
Neuropsychological Tests
Spanish-speaking
Neurocognition
Assessment
Education
Sociocultural
Medical and Health Sciences
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Experimental Psychology
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Psychology
Language
Abstract
ObjectivesWe investigated the impact of culturally relevant social, educational, and language factors on cognitive test performance among Spanish speakers living near the US-Mexico border.MethodsParticipants included 254 healthy native Spanish speakers from the Neuropsychological Norms for the US-Mexico Border Region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project (Age: M = 37.3, SD = 10.4; Education: M = 10.7, SD = 4.3; 59% Female). A comprehensive neuropsychological battery was administered in Spanish. Individual test scaled scores and T-scores (based on region-specific norms adjusted for age, education, and sex) were averaged to create Global Mean Scaled and T-scores. Measures of culturally relevant factors included a self-reported indicator of educational quality/access (proportion of education in Spanish-speaking country, quality of school/classroom setting, stopped attending school to work), childhood socioeconomic environment (parental education, proportion of time living in Spanish-speaking country, childhood socioeconomic and health status, access to basic resources, work as a child), and Spanish/English language use and fluency.ResultsSeveral culturally relevant variables were significantly associated with unadjusted Global Scaled Scores in univariable analyses. When using demographically adjusted T-scores, fewer culturally relevant characteristics were significant. In multivariable analyses, being bilingual (p = .04) and working as a child for one's own benefit compared to not working as a child (p = .006) were significantly associated with higher Global Mean T-score, accounting for 9% of variance.ConclusionsDemographically adjusted normative data provide a useful tool for the identification of brain dysfunction, as these account for much of the variance of sociocultural factors on cognitive test performance. Yet, certain culturally relevant variables still contributed to cognitive test performance above and beyond basic demographics, warranting further investigation.