학술논문

D3R Grand Challenge 4: ligand similarity and MM-GBSA-based pose prediction and affinity ranking for BACE-1 inhibitors
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 34(2)
Subject
Medicinal and Biomolecular Chemistry
Chemical Sciences
Generic health relevance
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases
Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases
Binding Sites
Drug Design
Enzyme Inhibitors
Humans
Ligands
Molecular Docking Simulation
Protein Binding
Protein Conformation
Small Molecule Libraries
Software
Pose prediction
Docking
Binding affinity
Ligand similarity
MM-GBSA
Theoretical and Computational Chemistry
Medicinal & Biomolecular Chemistry
Medicinal and biomolecular chemistry
Theoretical and computational chemistry
Language
Abstract
The Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) Grand Challenges present an opportunity to assess, in the context of a blind predictive challenge, the accuracy and the limits of tools and methodologies designed to help guide pharmaceutical drug discovery projects. Here, we report the results of our participation in the D3R Grand Challenge 4 (GC4), which focused on predicting the binding poses and affinity ranking for compounds targeting the [Formula: see text]-amyloid precursor protein (BACE-1). Our ligand similarity-based protocol using HYBRID (OpenEye Scientific Software) successfully identified poses close to the native binding mode for most of the ligands with less than 2 Å RMSD accuracy. Furthermore, we compared the performance of our HYBRID-based approach to that of AutoDock Vina and DOCK 6 and found that using a reference ligand to guide the docking process is a better strategy for pose prediction and helped HYBRID to perform better here. We also conducted end-point free energy estimates on molecules dynamics based ensembles of protein-ligand complexes using molecular mechanics combined with generalized Born surface area method (MM-GBSA). We found that the binding affinity ranking based on MM-GBSA scores have poor correlation with the experimental values. Finally, the main lessons from our participation in D3R GC4 are: (i) the generation of the macrocyclic conformers is a key step for successful pose prediction, (ii) the protonation states of the BACE-1 binding site should be treated carefully, (iii) the MM-GBSA method could not discriminate well between different predicted binding poses, and (iv) the MM-GBSA method does not perform well at predicting protein-ligand binding affinities here.