학술논문

Perceptions and Cost-Analysis of a Multiple Mini-Interview in a Pharmacy School Admissions Process.
Document Type
article
Source
American journal of pharmaceutical education. 79(9)
Subject
Humans
Perception
Education
Pharmacy
School Admission Criteria
Schools
Pharmacy
Internet
Costs and Cost Analysis
Female
Male
Interviews as Topic
Surveys and Questionnaires
admission interview
multiple mini interviews
pharmacy students
Education
Pharmacy
Schools
Curriculum and Pedagogy
Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveTo improve the quality of admissions interviews for a doctor of pharmacy program, using a multiple mini-interview (MMI) in place of the standard interview.MethodsStakeholders completed an anonymous web-based survey. This study characterized perceptions of the MMI format across 3 major stakeholders (candidates, interviewers, admissions committee members) and included comparative cost estimates.Costs were estimated using human and facility resources from the 2012 cycle (standard format) and the 2013 cycle (MMI format).ResultsMost candidates (65%), interviewers (86%), and admissions committee members (79%) perceived the MMI format as effective for evaluating applicants, and most (59% of candidates, 84% of interviewers, 77% of committee members) agreed that the MMI format should be continued. Cost per candidate interviewed was $136.34 (standard interview) vs $75.30 (MMI).ConclusionPerceptions of the MMI process were favorable across stakeholder groups, and this format was less costly per candidate interviewed.