학술논문

Evaluation of bias and gender/racial concordance based on sentiment analysis of narrative evaluations of clinical clerkships using natural language processing
Document Type
article
Source
BMC Medical Education. 24(1)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Humans
Sentiment Analysis
Clinical Clerkship
Natural Language Processing
Education
Medical
Students
Medical
Faculty
Medical
Natural language processing
Bias in medical education
Medical student evaluations
Narrative evaluations
Public Health and Health Services
Curriculum and Pedagogy
Medical Informatics
Clinical sciences
Curriculum and pedagogy
Specialist studies in education
Language
Abstract
There is increasing interest in understanding potential bias in medical education. We used natural language processing (NLP) to evaluate potential bias in clinical clerkship evaluations. Data from medical evaluations and administrative databases for medical students enrolled in third-year clinical clerkship rotations across two academic years. We collected demographic information of students and faculty evaluators to determine gender/racial concordance (i.e., whether the student and faculty identified with the same demographic). We used a multinomial log-linear model for final clerkship grades, using predictors such as numerical evaluation scores, gender/racial concordance, and sentiment scores of narrative evaluations using the SentimentIntensityAnalyzer tool in Python. 2037 evaluations from 198 students were analyzed. Statistical significance was defined as P