학술논문

A randomized phase III study of pretransplant conditioning for AML/MDS with fludarabine and once daily IV busulfan ± clofarabine in allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Document Type
article
Source
Bone Marrow Transplantation. 57(8)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology
Hematology
Transplantation
Cancer
Clinical Research
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
Good Health and Well Being
Bayes Theorem
Busulfan
Clofarabine
Graft vs Host Disease
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Humans
Leukemia
Myeloid
Acute
Neoplasm Recurrence
Local
Neoplasms
Second Primary
Transplantation Conditioning
Vidarabine
Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Immunology
Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
Pretransplant conditioning with Fludarabine (Flu)-Busulfan (Bu) is safe, but clofarabine (Clo) has improved antileukemic activity. Hypothesis: Flu+Clo-Bu (FCB) yields superior progression-free survival (PFS) after allogeneic transplantation. We randomized 250 AML/MDS patients aged 3-70, Karnofsky Score ≥80, with matched donors, to FCB (n = 120) or Flu-Bu (n = 130), stratifying complete remission (CR) vs. No CR, (NCR). HCT-CI scores varied, from 0 to 10. All evaluable patients engrafted. Median follow-up was 66 months (interquartile range: 58-80). Three-year relapse incidence (RI), 25% with FCB, vs. 39% with Flu-Bu (p = 0.018), offset by higher non-relapse mortality, 22.6% (95%CI: 16-30.2%) vs. 12.3% (95%CI: 6.5-19%). Three-year PFS was 52% (95%CI: 44-62%) (FCB), vs. 48% (95%CI: 41-58%) (Flu-Bu). FCB benefited CR patients less, NCR patients age ≤ 60 had 3-year 34% RI (95%CI: 19-49%) (FCB) vs. 56% (95%CI: 38-70%) after Flu-Bu (p = 0.037). NCR patients >60 years had 3-year RI 10.0% (FCB), vs. 56.0%, after Flu-Bu (p = 0.003). Bayesian regression analysis including treatment-covariate interactions showed FCB superiority in NCR patients with low HCT-CI (0-2). Serious adverse event profiles were similar for the regimens. Conditioning with FCB did not improve PFS overall, but improved disease control in NCR patients, mandating confirmatory trials. Remission status and HCT-CI should be considered when using FCB.