학술논문

Pilot Evaluation of the Unsupervised, At-Home Cogstate Brief Battery in ADNI-2
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 83(2)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Biological Psychology
Clinical Sciences
Neurosciences
Psychology
Acquired Cognitive Impairment
Brain Disorders
Alzheimer's Disease
Aging
Behavioral and Social Science
Dementia
Neurodegenerative
Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD)
Clinical Research
Neurological
Aged
Cognitive Dysfunction
Female
Humans
Male
Neuroimaging
Neuropsychological Tests
Pilot Projects
Telemedicine
Alzheimer's disease
clinical trials as a topic
cognition
digital technology
healthcare research
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Alzheimer’s disease
Cognitive Sciences
Neurology & Neurosurgery
Clinical sciences
Biological psychology
Language
Abstract
BackgroundThere is a need for feasible, scalable assessments to detect cognitive impairment and decline. The Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) is validated for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and in unsupervised and bring your own device contexts. The CBB has shown usability for self-completion in the home but has not been employed in this way in a multisite clinical trial in AD.ObjectiveThe objective of the pilot was to evaluate feasibility of at-home, self-completion of the CBB in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) over 24 months.MethodsThe CBB was included as a pilot for cognitively normal (CN) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) participants in ADNI-2, invited to take the assessment in-clinic, then at at-home over a period of 24 months follow-up. Data were analyzed to explore acceptability/usability, concordance of in-clinic and at-home assessment, and validity.ResultsData were collected for 104 participants (46 CN, 51 MCI, and 7 AD) who consented to provide CBB data. Subsequent analyses were performed for the CN and MCI groups only. Test completion rates were 100%for both the first in-clinic supervised and first at-home unsupervised assessments, with few repeat performances required. However, available follow-up data declined sharply over time. Good concordance was seen between in-clinic and at-home assessments, with non-significant and small effect size differences (Cohen's d between -0.04 and 0.28) and generally moderate correlations (r = 0.42 to 0.73). Known groups validity was also supported (11/16 comparisons with Cohen's d≥0.3).ConclusionThese data demonstrate the feasibility of use for the CBB for unsupervised at-home, testing, including MCI groups. Optimal approaches to the application of assessments to support compliance over time remain to be determined.